The Republican presidential candidates Tuesday night, during a GOP debate in Arizona, took shots at President Barack Obama for his pro-choice history.
Newt Gingrich deflected a question about Obama's recent decision mandating that employers' insurance plans cover contraception by pointing out that Obama voted in favor of a law that protected abortion provides during his term as state senator of Illinois
"You did not once during the 2008 campaign ask why Barack Obama voted in favor of legalizing infanticide," Gingrich said. "If we're going to debate about who is the extremist on this issues, it is President Obama, who, as a state senator, voted to protect doctors who killed babies.
Mitt Romney lambasted Obama's new requirement that insurers of faith-based organizations who object to birth control must offer the coverage to those groups' employees for free.
"I don’t think we've seen in the history of this country the kind of attack on religious freedom we've seen in Barack Obama most recently requiring the Catholic Church to provide for its employees and its various enterprises health care insurance that would include birth control, sterilization and the morning after pill," he said. "He tried to retreat from that, but he retreated in a way that was not appropriate, because these insurance companies have to provide these same things, and now the Catholic Church will have to pay for them."
In fact, the Catholic Church is exempt from Obama's contraception mandate.

- Enjoy this article? Help vote it up the 'Vine.
- Public Discussion (13)
Abortion is not infanticide...and late term abortion is between a woman and her doctor...it's not the government's business.
Oh...and of course...let's not forget that Gingrich is lying, yet again....
Newt: Media never asked Obama about 'infanticide' - except it did
- 3 votes
Oh...and of course...let's not forget that Gingrich is lying, yet again....
I can only hope there aren't enough intellectually-challenged voters out there who would believe him. If his words were to be taken seriously, it would mean that Obama is evil-incarnate. And this is what's coming out of the mouth of Gringrich; a known liar, unrepentant cheat, serial adulterer, religious hypocrite, and the consummate immoral person.
- 3 votes
it would mean that Obama is evil-incarnate.
There are people out there who really, really want to believe that...no matter how ridiculous it is!
- 3 votes
Arizona is receptive place for Obama Derangement and hate speech...unfortunately...
- 3 votes
They make Obama the adult in the room the sane one. The Repubs have totally lost it
- 3 votes
The longer the crazy Republicans go on like this...the more they prove that President Obama was the best choice in 2008...and the by far the best choice in 2012.
- 3 votes
This latest absurdity is only the beginning. The GOP contenders have no valid, concrete plans for the country; no magic bullet; no clue how they can do better in reviving the economy but it doesn't matter. So, they throw out re-hashed ideas from the 2008 campaign because the core far Right Republicans are no longer grounded in the real world. They want to hear anti Obama rhetoric, slurs, false accusations (which they accept as true), religious fervor, anything but reality. They want blood. The best analogy of the current situation with the far Right may be odious to many but, sadly, realistic. In 2012, Obama is to the Tea Party and Christian Conservatives what the Jews in 1930's Europe were to the Nazis; the root of all ills and evil.
- 3 votes
They want to hear anti Obama rhetoric, slurs, false accusations (which they accept as true), religious fervor, anything but reality.
That could actually be their new party slogan...."The GOP: Anything But Reality"
- 3 votes
Newt Gingrich provides prima facie confirmation of the disaster that is Citizens United. If not for one, crazy-assed, mega-rich guy, Gingrich would be in a checkout line at the nearest Tiffany's instead of continuing to infect the airwaves with his rhetorical bile.
- 3 votes
If not for one, crazy-assed, mega-rich guy...
Ha! So true...and so well-said!
- 2 votes
Rachel Maddow keeps referring to Sheldon Adelson as "Newt Gingirch's billionaire". She's wrong. Newt Gingirch doesn't have a billionaire. Sheldon Adelson has a Presidential primary candidate.
- 2 votes
Newt Gingirch doesn't have a billionaire. Sheldon Adelson has a Presidential primary candidate.
Indeed...bought and paid for!
- 4 votes
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |



